- Reference manual
- Built-in Predicates
- Notation of Predicate Descriptions
- Character representation
- Loading Prolog source files
- Editor Interface
- Verify Type of a Term
- Comparison and Unification of Terms
- Control Predicates
- Meta-Call Predicates
- Delimited continuations
- Exception handling
- Printing messages
- Handling signals
- DCG Grammar rules
- Declaring predicate properties
- Examining the program
- Input and output
- Status of streams
- Primitive character I/O
- Term reading and writing
- Analysing and Constructing Terms
- Analysing and Constructing Atoms
- Localization (locale) support
- Character properties
- Character Conversion
- Misc arithmetic support predicates
- Built-in list operations
- Finding all Solutions to a Goal
- Formatted Write
- Global variables
- Terminal Control
- Operating System Interaction
- File System Interaction
- User Top-level Manipulation
- Creating a Protocol of the User Interaction
- Debugging and Tracing Programs
- Obtaining Runtime Statistics
- Execution profiling
- Memory Management
- Windows DDE interface
- Built-in Predicates
- Reference manual
The predicates reset/3 and shift/1 implement delimited continuations for Prolog. Delimited continuations for Prolog are described in Schrijvers et al., 2013 (preprint PDF). The mechanism allows for proper coroutines, two or more routines whose execution is interleaved, while they exchange data. Note that coroutines in this sense differ from coroutines realised using attributed variables as described in chapter 8.
Note that shift/1 captures the forward continuation. It notably does not capture choicepoints. Choicepoints created before the continuation is captured remain open, while choicepoints created when the continuation is executed live their normal life. Unfortunately the consequences for committing a choicepoint is complicated. In general a cut (!/0) in the continuation does not have the expected result. Negation (\+/1) and if-then(-else) (->/2) behave as expected, provided the continuation is called immediately. This works because for \+/1 and ->/2 the continuation contains a reference to the choicepoint that must be cancelled and this reference is restored when possible. If, as with tabling, the continuation is saved and called later, the commit has no effect. We illustrate the three scenarios using with the programs below.
t1 :- reset(gbad, ball, Cont), ( Cont == 0 -> true ; writeln(resuming), call(Cont) ). gbad :- n, !, fail. gbad. n :- shift(ball), writeln(n).
Here, the !/0 has no effect:
?- t1. resuming n true.
The second example uses \+/1,
which is essentially
t2 :- reset(gok, ball, Cont), ( Cont == 0 -> true ; writeln(resuming), call(Cont) ). gok :- \+ n.
In this scenario the normal semantics of \+/1 is preserved:
?- t1. resuming n false.
In the last example we illustrate what happens if we assert the continuation to be executed later. We write the negation using if-then-else to make it easier to explain the behaviour.
:- dynamic cont/1. t3 :- retractall(cont(_)), reset(gassert, ball, Cont), ( Cont == 0 -> true ; asserta(cont(Cont)) ). c3 :- cont(Cont), writeln(resuming), call(Cont). gassert :- ( n -> fail ; true ).
Now, t3/0 succeeds twice. This is because n/0 shifts, so the commit to the fail/0 branch is not executed and the true/0 branch is evaluated normally. Calling the continuation later using c3/0 fails because the choicepoint that realised the if-then-else does not exist in the continuation and thus the effective continuation is the remainder of n/0 and fail/0 in gassert/0 .
?- t3. true ; true. ?- c3. resuming n false.
- reset(:Goal, ?Ball, -Continuation)
- Call Goal. If Goal calls shift/1
and the argument of shift/1
can be unified with Ball,74The
argument order described in Schrijvers et
al., 2013 is
reset(Goal,Continuation,Ball). We swapped the argument order for compatibility with catch/3 shift/1 causes reset/3 to return, unifying Continuation with a goal that represents the continuation after shift/1. In other words, meta-calling Continuation completes the execution where shift left it. If Goal does not call shift/1, Continuation are unified with the integer
0(zero).75Note that older versions also unify Ball with
0. Testing whether or not shift happened on Ball however is always ambiguous.
- Abandon the execution of the current goal, returning control to just after the matching reset/3 call. This is similar to throw/1 except that (1) nothing is‘undone' and (2) the 3th argument of reset/3 is unified with the continuation, which allows the code calling reset/3 to resume the current goal.
- Similar to shift/1.
This version is intended for situations where it is assumed the
continuation is copied and saved to be executed one or multiple times in
a different context. This notably prevents restoring choice points saved