- assert(+S, +P, +O, +DB)
- A triple has been asserted.
- retract(+S, +P, +O, +DB)
- A triple has been deleted.
- update(+S, +P, +O, +DB, +Action)
- A triple has been updated.
- A new literal has been created. Literal is the argument of
literal(Arg)of the triple's object. This event is introduced in version 2.5.0 of this library.
- The literal Literal is no longer used by any triple.
- transaction(+BeginOrEnd, +Id)
- Mark begin or end of the commit of a transaction started by
end(Nesting). Nesting expresses the nesting level of transactions, starting at‘0' for a toplevel transaction. Id is the second argument of rdf_transaction/2. The following transaction Ids are pre-defined by the library:
- load(+BeginOrEnd, +Spec)
- Mark begin or end of rdf_load_db/1
or load through rdf_load/2
from a cached file. Spec is currently defined as
- Marks begin/end of a re-hash due to required re-indexing or garbage collection.
Mask is a list of events this monitor is interested in.
Default (empty list) is to report all events. Otherwise each element is
of the form +Event or -Event to include or exclude monitoring for
certain events. The event-names are the functor names of the events
described above. The special name
all refers to all events
assert(load) to assert events originating from rdf_load_db/1.
As loading triples using rdf_load_db/1
is very fast, monitoring this at the triple level may seriously harm
This predicate is intended to maintain derived data, such as a journal, information for undo, additional indexing in literals, etc. There is no way to remove registered monitors. If this is required one should register a monitor that maintains a dynamic list of subscribers like the XPCE broadcast library. A second subscription of the same hook predicate only re-assignes the mask.
The monitor hooks are called in the order of registration and in the
same thread that issued the database manipulation. To process all
changes in one thread they should be send to a thread message queue. For
all updating events, the monitor is called while the calling thread has
a write lock on the RDF store. This implies that these events are
processed strickly synchronous, even if modifications originate from
multiple threads. In particular, the
... updates ... end sequence is never interleaved with
other events. Same for