B.5 Breakpoint and watchpoint handling

SWI-Prolog support breakpoints. Breakpoints can be manipulated with the library library(prolog_breakpoints). Setting a breakpoint replaces a virtual machine instruction with the D_BREAK instruction. If the virtual machine executes a D_BREAK, it performs a callback to decide on the action to perform. This section describes this callback, called prolog:break_hook/7.

[hook,semidet]prolog:break_hook(+Clause, +PC, +FR, +BFR, +Expression, +Debug, -Action)

Experimental This hook is called if the virtual machine executes a D_BREAK, set using set_breakpoint/4. Clause and PC identify the breakpoint. FR and BFR provide the environment frame and current choicepoint. Debug is true if the system was in debug mode when the breakpoint was reached, otherwise Debug is false. Expression identifies the action that is interrupted, and is one of the following:

call(Goal)

The instruction will call Goal. This is generated for nearly all instructions. Note that Goal is semantically equivalent to the compiled body term, but might differ syntactically. This is notably the case when arithmetic expressions are compiled in optimized mode (see optimise). In particular, the arguments of arithmetic expressions have already been evaluated. Thus, A is 3*B, where B equals 3 results in a term call(A is 9) if the clause was compiled with optimization enabled.

!

The instruction will call the cut. Because the semantics of metacalling the cut differs from executing the cut in its original context we do not wrap the cut in call/1.

:-

The breakpoint is on the neck instruction, i.e., after performing the head unifications.

exit

The breakpoint is on the exit instruction, i.e., at the end of the clause. Note that the exit instruction may not be reached due to last-call optimisation.

unify_exit

The breakpoint is on the completion of an in-lined unification while the system is not in debug mode. If the system is in debug mode, inlined unification is returned as call(Var=Term).^{249This hack will disappear if we find a good solution for applying D_BREAK to inlined unification. Only option might be to place the break on both the unification start and end instructions.}

If prolog:break_hook/7 succeeds, it must unify Action with a value that describes how execution must continue. Possible values for Action are:

continue

Just continue as if no breakpoint was present.

debug

Continue in debug mode. See debug/0.

trace

Continue in trace mode. See trace/0.

call(Goal)

Execute Goal instead of the goal that would be executed. Goal is executed as call/1, preserving (non-)determinism and exceptions.

If this hook throws an exception, the exception is propagated normally. If this hook is not defined or fails, the default action is executed. This implies that, if the thread is in debug mode, the tracer will be enabled (trace) and otherwise the breakpoint is ignored (continue).

This hook allows for injecting various debugging scenarios into the executable without recompiling. The hook can access variables of the calling context using the frame inspection predicates. Here are some examples.

• Create conditional breakpoints by imposing conditions before deciding the return trace.
• Watch variables at a specific point in the execution. Note that binding of these variables can be monitored using attributed variables, see section 8.1.
• Dynamically add assertions on variables using assertion/1.
• Wrap the Goal into a meta-call that traces progress of the Goal.